Better ways to solve problems than recall

The recent recall efforts regarding Mr. Barrera are misguided. As former superintendent of the Stony Creek Joint Unified School District there have been many occasions when I have worked with Mr. Barrera. Whether it is a SELPA workgroup, superintendents’ meeting or one-on-one, he has been focused on what is best for kids.

This past year, the SELPA (Special Education Local Plan) has come under much scrutiny especially due to excess costs – costs associated with running the program, and bill-back charges to the school districts. These costs to the districts have spurred the current controversy. None of the school districts want costs to increase more to operate special education programs; however, school districts throughout the state and nation are required to provide services to students that meet program criteria. In an effort to combat these excess costs, a team of experts was asked to review the SELPA programs. As a result of this study, the SELPA and district superintendents have accomplished a great deal, including Mr. Barrera, to resolve these issues.

When school districts are faced with budgets that require reduction in staff and services, it is a nightmare for superintendents, school boards and the community. I have been told the cost of holding a special recall election will cost the taxpayers $36,000. This is not the answer. Becoming more active at local school board meetings and GCOE board meetings is a more appropriate means to resolve issues.

My associations with the county schools and Mr. Barrera have been very positive. There is a forum for concerns and disputes; a recall election is not in the best interest of county residents.

Charles Beath

Willows